
Life Settlements Taxation Controversy
This is an important follow-up to my “post-AALU” post on the Taxation of Life Settlements. Additional posts on the other subjects covered by Larry Brody and Steve Leimberg will follow in a few days.
More on the Taxation of Life Settlements
Since my prior post, many professional commentators have expressed their opinions regarding the most important (and unfortunately adverse) holding in Rev. Rul. 2009-13: the required adjustment to basis that must be made when a policyowner sells a policy under a life settlement transaction, namely, that the “cost of insurance” charges must be subtracted from premiums paid. Since these “cost of insurance” charges have already been subtracted internally in determining the policy’s cash value, this appears to be the equivalent of a double subtraction of the same amounts, especially since the policy’s cash value is an important determinant of the purchase price a purchaser is willing to pay, because it directly affects the future premium payments required to maintain the policy.
Many commentators agree, then, that this is a very controversial holding, and I personally believe it might well be successfully challenged in court. However, I do not think any of us would encourage any of our own clients to be the guinea pig who challenges the IRS … unless, of course, a large amount of money is at stake, which might be the case if long-term capital gain rates are increased in the future. Even now, if the policy being sold is a rated policy, the actual “cost of insurance” charges will be significantly higher, meaning (if actual charges are the correct method of calculating “cost of insurance” for this purpose) a larger amount will need to be subtracted in determining adjusted basis, leading to a larger amount being subject to tax as a capital gain.
RIGHT NOW, HOWEVER, PERHAPS THE MOST IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO KEEP IN MIND IS AS FOLLOWS: THIS HOLDING WILL NOT BE APPLIED ADVERSELY TO SALES OCCURRING BEFORE AUGUST 26, 2009. THIS MEANS THAT, IF YOU HAVE ANY CLIENTS WHOSE POLICIES COULD POTENTIALLY BE CANDIDATES FOR A LIFE SETTLEMENT TRANSACTION, RIGHT NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT. SINCE THESE TRANSACTIONS DO NOT COME TO FRUITION OVERNIGHT, THE TIME HORIZON TO START THE BALL ROLLING IS VERY SHORT INDEED.
Please contact us for more information.
Trackback URL for "Life Settlements Taxation Controversy"
Subscribe to Blog
Blog Archive
- January 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (2)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (2)
- August 2011 (6)
- July 2011 (13)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (11)
- April 2011 (12)
- March 2011 (16)
- February 2011 (5)
- January 2011 (4)




If you are looking for Wilson
If you are looking for Wilson Tennis Online in behalf of transaction, please keep reading this entirely diminutive article and you just sway discover some dope that may be useful. Some people over that Wilson Tennis Rackets actually invented tennis, they be undergoing been complex in the divertissement for so long. Sorry to bring to light, that is not the case. There is a very worthy remonstrate with that this stationary has such an excellent status be known in tennis, which is they uniformly scheme and resign some of the finest Dunlop Tennis Racquets in the world. -http://www.wilsontennissale.com
Post new comment